Langrove vs. building it in‑house.
Same destination, your own AWS account. Without building the plumbing first.
| Building it in-houseTypically | LangroveIn your own AWS account | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it runs | Your cloud | Your own AWS account |
| Before the first feature | Sign-in, hosting, releases and security | Already built. Start on the feature. |
| Who builds | Your developers | Your AI agent, checked by your team |
| Upkeep | Your team, for every app | We ship updates. Your AWS admin applies them. |
| Security review | For each new app | Once, for every app |
| Cost | Developer time, plus cloud | One price, plus your AWS bill |
| Your code | Yours | Yours, readable in the console |
On our Hosted plan, apps run in Langrove's AWS account in Europe until you move them to yours.
Which one fits?
Building it yourself fits when
- You have a platform team to run it for years.
- Every change must be reviewed as a pull request in git.
- You need web pages rendered on the server.
Langrove fits when
- You'd rather spend developer time on the app, not the plumbing.
- IT wants one reviewed stack for every app.
- You want AI to build and a person to approve.